Post Oscars controversy review Multi camera Unit 35

Tom and I watched the Oscars and decided to take notes on the controversial talking points for our rundown, there was more to discuss controversy wise this time around than the pre Oscars rundown, from Trump, Jussie Smollet, Spike Lee and more.  

 

 

We did our post rundown without a script and completely improvised, I had started to plan a script but I could not finish it on time to film.            The quality and professionalism would have been an improvement if a script was used.

What we did well was that despite being improvised, we did well in switching topics and staying focused our talking points.

Referring back to the lack of a script, we had to film the same subject multiple times as we simply forgot what we were going to say or thought of a better thing to say in general.

Most of us agree that our rundown was a lot better than the pre rundown, especially in the tech side of it because the audio was better, however the lack of cameras at the time had us using a spare camera that has contrast and focus issues, Although these issues can potentially be fixed in the editing stage, I wish we could have maybe waited a day because we could have used the better equipment, another thing is that the edit was not done in time for release so it was delayed by a few days.

 

 

Another thing that could have been implemented to make it more lively could have been more comedy, for example Josh and Tom R’s rundown was mainly comedic in the dialogue and editing whereas ours was simple could have been improved if it was more lively.

Something else that was good about the rundown was that all of our points discussed were relevant and researched completely so that we understood the context as well as had an argument against a point or for a point.